This makes it so: 1) You have a case that is objectively more adjusted to reality, 2) the county's case is a computer program that doesn't work right, 3) other people's professional opinions agree with yours.

@Natalie Onacki first start by clearly defining your investment objectives and criteria.

The difference in the beginning is always unnoticeable (or at least unimpressive), but it's the end we're sacrificing.You may object by saying, "I'll just have to invest a little longer to make up."

You are hereby notified that you must object in writing to this deduction from your security deposit within 15 days from the time you receive this notice or I will be authorized to deduct my claim from your security deposit.

Say I buy a object for 100k with my own money, then I’d have to wait for 2 years to get them back out. would this not make the BRRRR method a bit long?

You are hereby notified that you must object in writing to this deduction from your security deposit within 15 days from the time you receive this notice or I will be authorized to deduct my claim from your security deposit.

I may need to reconsider my objectives.

@Jossue AlfonsoIt depends on your personal preferences, but assuming you are okay with both options, objectively borrowing money at 5.25% is a win.

I also am naturally similar to him in that I am not particularly spendy on objects, but I do spend quite a bit on travel, experiences, and self development.Your post solidified my position even more.1.

Since this would be my first deal, I need an objective opinion.