I have noticed in this forum that several posts state that you should not require or expect tenants in a rent to own/lease option to do any maintenance.

Looking for some experienced wisdom on "incentivizing" a tenant to move out during a 60 day notice period.I'll soon be taking over a SFR in CA but before I do the seller needs to get a family member to vacate the property.

This notice gets sent to the lender and that's how they catch it.

So in other words, all I'd be doing is locking more of my own money that I can't use into in the house, while subsequently decreasing my cash flow to get any of it back.

Is it noticeable? 

Always tag people with "@" if you want them to notice your comment/question.As to your question, "I am not disagreeing, but why is it a bad idea to say how much money I want to invest?"

You'll also want to ensure you have a good property manager to look after the upkeep of the property if you are not there to notice anything deteriorating or which may need attention.This article goes into a lot of the considerations about whether to form an LLC or not: https://www.mmpph.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/May-2019-newsletter.pdfCreating an LLC in California would cost you a minimum tax of $800 every year.

Here are some information about my situationPrice point: < $80kLoan: 20% down (to avoid PMI)Goal: Be cashflow positive after expenses, hoa's, taxes/insurance.So far, I've noticed that the condo properties I have analyzed, there is one that will squeak out $125-$175/month in cash flow.

Called the realtor ever time that I got notice on door.

A second question would be does the lease count as 30 or 60 day notice whichever is required in your area. or would you have to give the notice after the late payments that in the future rent would be going up?