Live for free, have the other tenants pay your mortgage, maybe even positive cash flow left over. 

For arguments sake using my own money doesn't affect my personal life & would give me more positive cashflow per month to build up for the next house as opposed to paying my investor back over 60 months.

But you should ask them if they're going to be in 1st position on the title of the property. 

you have to be positive that the numbers will yield profit for all involved parties. if you aren't sure of the exit strategy or how you will secure funds then you still have a far way to go. do you have cash buyers with verifiable proof of funds lined up?

Hindsight is 20/20 and a lot of resources out there push this type of positive only content. 

You are in the same position as the majority of investors starting out.

Many are legal, some are probably not so legal, some are probably specifically prohibited - so for sure you need to speak with an attorney about your strategy before you dive in.If my memory serves me right, it's what armando built his first guru program on - maybe it was his hair, or his smug attitude, or it was just him... but everything about the "subject to" thing rubs me the wrong way.The entire concept, i believe, really is way beyond a basic or straight-forward deal, and also puts your client in a fairly precarious position where the note could get called at basically any moment, and if they can't pay off the note (which they can't, hence the agreement to the subject to) they just defaulted and are now facing foreclosure - In fact, I witnessed this exact situation today on a $12mil note that got called in UT county.

The house is within 5 feet of the property line, so there is a setback issue.Below looks positive to show that the boundaries are not encroached, but i realize that they are not the actual plats and final say...

On a more positive note, I would 1000% recommend getting started with Podio.

Ask from a position of power, will help in negotiations.4.