data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/58241/58241dc0fa04b975184c4417c1e8a83b5f1781b9" alt=""
23 December 2013 | 6 replies
The new Dodd-Frank go into effect on Jan 10, 2014 and the rules apply to financing for owner occupant buyers, not commercial or investor to investor transactions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1f752/1f752f9adc64b81dfe81514cd600de898a31a157" alt=""
26 December 2013 | 6 replies
A rule of investing that I have learned from a well-known investor is "Thou shalt maintain control".Again, I am not saying that these funds and people who invest in them have not made money.
26 December 2013 | 5 replies
Usually appraisers have a rule where any comp can't be more than 20% bigger or smaller than the subject property.Also, age can make a difference in regards to the surrounding neighborhood.For example, in Grant Park, a Victorian neighborhood in Atlanta, there are a few brick houses, that were built on infill lots in the 50's or 60's.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cbd19/cbd19aaf00c8d1656e747edf6e754cf2010bb331" alt=""
27 December 2013 | 3 replies
It would be rare for a lender to allow a sale for less than what is owed, but if they do they will need to release the lien and they may not be able to seek a judgment for remaining amounts due if they failed to attempt to get the full amount from the sale.The deal illustrated by Chris would be a great deal, but probably won't happen as the purchase price is less than the mortgage, a 150K home needing 20K in repairs would be about 70% of 130K as the rule of thumb or about 90-92K.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a718c/a718c3aa994f041f067ff8d3c6eb6b98ab640fda" alt=""
6 August 2021 | 25 replies
Local jurisdictions may have rules on this type of thing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b5964/b59641a32ab72d0e7c4b5a983836d5fcdcf74e82" alt=""
23 December 2013 | 3 replies
Where the money comes from isn't directly related to the 70% rule.The 70% rule says that if your purchase price plus rehab cost is 70% of the eventually selling price (i.e., ARV), you use hard money to fund the bulk of the costs, and you hold the property for six months then your profit will be about 15% of ARV.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/15374/153743240b1bea2971950befac89d47ee4dc86ac" alt=""
26 December 2013 | 9 replies
As to the marketing of legal services, I would think that company would have some rules.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f1370/f1370db9ccf4cdb360fac3fcd8a9a7669ebf01de" alt=""
25 December 2013 | 13 replies
We are also very punctual with: Rent due on, or before, the first; Notice to Vacate is served on the fourth (first offence) or second (recurring offence).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/13c0f/13c0ff135f443dabe2d34c60f7281662f7ed7864" alt=""
14 January 2014 | 12 replies
The 2% rule is challenging, but the 1% rule is definitely possible.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7a9eb/7a9eb83dfd24113bca03d82beb6c4ab8479e481e" alt=""
30 December 2013 | 9 replies
Now that I am working on my fourth property, people want to join me now, but I just think to myself,"When I make a decision on how the money is spent, or who will do the work, I REALLY don't want to argue with someone about whats best."