data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6035/d6035e7791659c5143808b40cf6003d1ff80a613" alt=""
8 February 2017 | 2 replies
I do not have any rental properties yet but anytime I've checked into deducting these two items for our primary residence, I was always told you can't do that.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0057e/0057e239981758000a74b0ec74013069120047d2" alt=""
12 February 2017 | 3 replies
The other items are visual only inspections and no additional inspections are done to find the source of the issueHUD will do no repairs nor provide any price reductions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/176a6/176a6fe3dffb2e69bc9036511843234357e855bc" alt=""
15 February 2017 | 4 replies
It sounds like you have some tenants that will obey the request; however, just stay firm to the dates and items discussed.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/152b9/152b99c19db496f2cb1a4fe5798341e218ca1e85" alt=""
7 March 2017 | 23 replies
Additionally, in the time I have lived here I have replaced almost all of the high ticket items.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b65f8/b65f84a4e5885528a089af2d18b12c05b6d59fa3" alt=""
7 February 2017 | 3 replies
The house looks solid for 170K, however I am assuming you identified everything that needed to be fixed and the electric was the biggest item?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5e416/5e416136abdc40fe53757a258760245a5bebaae2" alt=""
8 March 2017 | 5 replies
Assuming it needs, at the very least, paint and some fixtures, then the retail cost of those items will come off the $115k.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7f05c/7f05cbf00ee840e641a3b553cdf6b30bbc671205" alt=""
10 March 2017 | 6 replies
The two largest items being replacing some windows and reframing the roof of a pre-existing 400 sq. ft. back addition to the house.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/152b9/152b99c19db496f2cb1a4fe5798341e218ca1e85" alt=""
10 March 2017 | 2 replies
All of the items deducted were normal wear and tear items, AND we had listed each item during the walk through which they never signed.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e7f2a/e7f2a282b25ce869111135ce80300721af0d06ce" alt=""
22 May 2019 | 8 replies
Curious if you could provide some line items behind the $28k?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/218de/218de9c1cc355545fa4543f45d985578fca8d102" alt=""
16 March 2017 | 7 replies
Definitely no evictions, ability to provide proof of income 3x the rent, 600+ score, as few items to check.