And the reason that the thread goes that way is there is so many first time investors like yourself on BP that we do tend to share the ups and downs of a model to evoke thought and some debate on either side of a scheme or model.So if someone was going just answer your question.. you would probably have gotten no responses on the thread .... or just short response to your question   Yes I know someone or know I don't. end of discussion... does not make for a very interesting sharing of ideas.

Of course, you then have to get into the "reasonable" vs "unreasonable" debate ...

I debated doing these, but then ended up just putting in 6 new meters.

I debated on whether or not I should do this for quite some time, and here I am, I finally decided to do it.For those of you who don't know, I am a separating veteran. 

This site is for conversation and debate, but we will NOT allow members to flame others.

You're welcome to disagree with one another, debate, etc, but I don't want this discussion to get out of control.

Originally posted by Tim Wieneke:Along with it's variations the oath is clear and I am in complete agreement with it Sounds like we're in complete agreement on something...The doctors are free to follow through on their commitment to the oath....If only the oath had been extended to Terry Schiavo...I won't debate it, because I can certainly see both sides, but the most common modern version of the Hippocratic Oath clearly states, "Above all, I must not play at God."

It's not an IO vs leverage debate.

No.Obviously if that were true there would be no debate over which mailer to send right?

Although you may feel my opinions are counter-productive, I ask you not to debate about the virtues of capitalism.