I will also disagree with everyone above, you could make both of these strategies hands off, with the right moves.These baby steps during the next year will gain you the confidence and the knowledge, to best utilize that 100k, if that is the best case at that point. and you may be able to stretch that 100k into a few deals, or limitless deals if you have the right pieces to playHappy to chat more and give my guidance!

Again, others might feel differently here.3) property level due diligence: (takes seconds to weeks per deal): here is where I drill in with the low-level details.a) pro forma popping: I examine all the assumptions, and see if they are overoptimistic or not.

I disagree.

If you disagree with that summary, I recommend you take it up with the journalist.Third, I didn't claim that everyone leaves for all of those reasons.

But even here, if the buyer and seller are dealers ("flippers"), then money damages could be awarded.My reading of the Lawler decision is that while the trial court found the Plaintiff had proven his case and did in fact award specific performance, the appeals court disagreed and found the buyer/plaintiff did not allege and did not prove he was ready willing and able to close (an essential element of seeking to enforce the contract) and therefore was not entitle to specific performance.

Disagree 100%.

I am not a CPA and I disagree.

I'll disagree with a few things here. 

Don't disagree with you in any way there! 

@Todd Goedeke I would have to disagree.......Why would this be a blanket rule across all municipalities?