Except that, there is no issue with Realtors using the mail with proper disclosures. 

I am conflicted on what is best as I see good and bad to doing either.Now, assuming your state allows proper licensure of rent to own/Contract for Title lending operations (a very big assumption) that lend on residences, you could choose to do this legally, but if the state allows lease with option to purchase, that might be a better choice.In park name - easier to manage administrative work, ensure taxes are paid, easier to recover if owner walks away or quits paying park rentIn buyer name - they pay taxes, if home is damaged would seem to limit park's responsibility, no insurance costFederal law require the title be in the name of the borrower with the lender's lien on the title.

It's hard to respond properly to this thread while I'm at work.  

Step 3 is finding a buyer, which if Step 1 and 2 are done properly and it is a deal, won't be an issue.

This might not be the proper location for my question but the people I look up to most tread this section.

There's to many unknowns about the deal to analyze it properly and give you an educated answer to your question.

The foreclosure path is the most expensive path and you can put a lot of weight on that one, i.e., if a foreclosure exit doesn't work, then the deal should not be done. 

If it becomes an issue, change the month to month lease to say no parking in driveway, giving whatever notice is proper.4.  

How can I properly screen her???

Please do not put too much (any) weight into this analysis.