Offering more bang for the buck is just good business for my business model I have other landlord friends who do not agree even after my good reviews.

This first tenants that we (almost) signed, were hands down the best tenants I've come across: they grew up in the neighborhood, wanted to be near their parents and siblings, and mostly wanted to be good role models for their nephews and nieces.

The same would be true for the other systems and their expected lives.I prefer not to just wing things so these are the types of models we use.

All those companies have the same model.  ..and they use the same speakers / salespeople..  

I already assume $50-100 worth of prep costs in between tenants so turnover is already part of my business model.

Add to that a basically exploitative model based on stealing equity from uneducated or elderly sellers I would argue this whole business model needs to made illegal with no ambiguity.

It doesn’t fit the model of business I am trying to run.

Essentially it breaks down as 3 partners, one provides sweat equity through property acquisition to placing property management, one does financial modeling and analysis, and the third provides capital.

I've been tempted to invest there many times but it just does not fit our model as there's no appreciation.One of my reia groups had several people go to buffalo, buy up all the tax lien properties at huge discounts, rehab, and try to resell.

Much of the "growth" reported by retailers has resulted from poaching existing store sales: The American Model of "Growth": Overbuilding and Poaching (November 19, 2013).Once the wheels fall off this model of "growth," chains will enter a cycle of closing marginal stores to boost profits.