Though if there is another access point, you could argue to have it removed, but that's likely a legal process.

But then I have heard some nonprofit lawyers (basically low-income-tenant-protection lawyers) argue otherwise.

Would you suddenly argue that the investor has no right to foreclose on the property because the bank "wrote off" the debt?

One could argue a contractor is not an inspector so I will have to wait and see how that pans out. 

Example: ABC, LLC doing business as Kittock Properties.

I am not arguing definitions to a term.  

I could see an argument that an LLC owned 100% by the original borrowers doesn't trigger the 'due on sale' right of the bank, because the beneficial interest in the LLC and right of occupancy remains with the original borrower...Anyone had a bank call them on this and attempt to argue such?

This is why it can be argued that I am not a wholesaler.

@Jay Hinrichs That does sound backwards a bit, but who am I to argue with Jay Hinrichs.  

XYZ is the parent company of ABC.In an NDA, if the company name "by and between ABC Company and {me the investor}" is not the same as the remaining document, which all references are to the parent company name XYZ, is this still valid or good?