they are just as well built as any site built home, so I would argue that they are actually better quality because they are built in a temperature controlled environment. 

At least then you could argue it would help the resale value.  

Sure, many may argue otherwise, but they are mostly either newbies that don't have much experience actually doing it and any experience they do have has been over the last year or so in a market where a well trained monkey could make high profits investing in RE or people trying to sell you stuff elsewhere.

I would argue that BP helps bring out all the difficulties and obstacles investors face so that they have a better idea of what they are getting into. 

The Commission argued that government could partially fund this effort by selling off some of its public property.Key Takeaways: Young people don't have access to property ownership and that impedes social mobility Many people don't have enough resources and assets to put down for collateral or for a down payment Action by the government is necessary in order to increase the supply of housing properties"Home ownership is increasingly out of reach for young people without “the bank of Mum and Dad”, a study warns today – demanding “radical action” from the Government."

We would argue flipping is getting too competitive at the moment and margin is tighter as people are fighting over limited supply of rehab potentials.

Then again, if you can argue and prove why it'll be more beneficial to NOI and DSCR, I'm sure they'd be more than happy to earn more via down payment and interest.

One could argue that profit is after all taxable deductions, which in my case could be around 150k.  

Some might argue that if you are wholesaling that it is easier if you are not a licensed Agent.  

I can't even argue with your post!!!!