Curious to hear any creative approaches that have worked in today's market.ARV and future value are speculative so when I am looking at property I am looking at it for longer term - does it fit within my strategy based on conservative estimates.

If these type of damages occur in the future, I would recommend holding the tenants deposit, or if there is a claim to be made through the insurance you sell them you could approach that avenue.

This is why I prefer the cash-for-keys approach.

Cost segregation utilizes the MACRS approach.

I've worked with many investors that take this approach.

The guy is genuine in his approach and really does help people get across the goal line.

I’ll certainly take this as a lesson to leave no detail overlooked and to approach every aspect of my agreements with care.

It takes the pressure off as deadlines approach and gives you room to solve unexpected issues.

Can try to reposition to Class B, but neighborhood may impede these efforts.Vacancy Est: Historically 10%, but 15-20% should be used to also cover tenant nonpayment, eviction costs & damages.Tenant Pool: majority will have FICO scores of 560-620 (approaching 22% probability of default), many blemishes, but should have no evictions in last 2 years.

Best regards, This approach is neutral and objective, focusing strictly on the criteria, and avoids discussing any specifics about the applicant’s personal situation.