I only ask that because From what I remember you can only accept accredited investors and marketing to mass is 506(c).

All accredited degree programs require structure classes.

House is selling for 660K with 300K in outstanding loan.Few options:Pay 50K in taxes and put the remaining money in VTSAX (Vanguard fund)Roll the money into 1031crowdfunding.com or kpi1031 or something similar in 3 different properties and get around 5% monthly cash flowPay 50k in taxes and put the remaining money in Norada Promissory note to get 15% monthly cash flow (I am accredited investor)Buy a turnkey property for 660K to 1M – preferably a duplex/fourplex.

I'm an accredited investor by the old metric but I really can't stand handing over personal financial info every time I consider doing a crowdfunded deal.

With that kind of money you are an accredited investor and have access to private investments.

I can raise the 20 to 30% for the down payment but none of them are accredited investors. 

My name is Matt Boos and I am a 43 year old accredited investor from Sioux Falls, SD. 

So that's 19 years of homeschooling, teaching, and parenting in a nutshell. lol.

As an example, the steps @Chris Levarek outlined (which were great), sound to me like general solicitation.Investors don't need to be accredited under 506(b), and if they state that they are, you don't need to verify.  506(c) requires you to do a detailed review to ensure they are all accredited.You're doing the right thing in meeting with an attorney, so this is not legal advice, just general guidance about where each of those options might take you.  

but, I personally find it unsatisfying and frustrating to have someone start a thread about them investing in RE syndication and asking other investors experience only to find that they have started the same exact thread many times in the past AND  after my exposure to their post....and then to top it off they are not even really investors, nor are they really going at the topic from an investor mindset, but, rather have a purely 100% ulterior motive of promoting their own syndication....AND to add injury to insult, they are really horrible garbage investments.My opinion of most accredited investors, is that trust is a key component for them, when investing in Syndication. if the networking technique is disingenuous, it just comes off as corny-time-share-tactics-manipulative base level conduct that is unappealing, untrustworthy and wastes time.I will say that all your points of essentially "caveat emptor" regarding ones own filter for things anywhere on the internet(including BP)are true, but, the benefit of micro-social media- climates like Bigger Pockets is that you get the benefit of other like minded, maybe even I dare say "smarter than me" individuals, weeding out what is the inevitable dissent into Craiglistification of said micro climate...meaning that eventually if all the post, or some critical mass of the posts, become of the aforementioned disingenuous type, the benefits of the this type of forum become less evident or more cumbersome and timely to get value from, and maybe even have negative return on time-equity.....IMHO