Obviously, cash flow would have to be such that you could absorb a salary, but it seems it might be better to have someone trained by the owner who is present for everyone in the building as necessary.Thank you all for your thoughts!

I think it will also depends on state laws and a lot of information not present but the HOA rules and insurances are two different things.

There software can tract really small differences in what's presented and what it should be.

I presently have a negative cash flow  in all 3 properties but am more interested in paying off the mortgages early to reap rewards later.Any thoughts? 

They did comment that the previous owners did not allow that, and I know through some research of my own that many parks don't. 

I'd love to learn more about investing in hotels and this type of properties, so please if you have any books/documentaries/any type of resource that I should definitely study before I venture in the wild, comment them below my post.Thank you so much in advance!

What I said in an earlier comment about "section 179 can't be used to create a business loss", that wasn't entirely accurate/complete. 

I prefer public comments here before you send a direct message, though. 

@Jason ODell, a few comments:1.

I tried to post my email here, and it told me I can't (only in the marketplace) and made me rewrite this twice.I take client reviews and comments very seriously, and have a lot of pride in what we're building here at TrueBooks.