It seems we are facing a similar problem; real estate is not just a numbers game, which is contrary to the thinking of most investors.

To me it’s a challenging game, an intricate puzzle where if you learn how to play you get great results.

Should I re evaluate what strategy I should use and maybe look further out in places such as Rochester and BRRR properties out thereHey @Jared Leggett, I know I'm jumping in here late in the game, and I have to admit that I haven't read all the many comments you've gotten, but I wanted to provide what I imagine and glean is a contrary view.It is easy to dunk on NYC for young investors starting out, but if you are a first time homebuyer you can buy a $1M property with $35k down (+ closing costs which can be avoided with seller's concessions).

I'm pretty new to the game and would love to get some advice from more experienced investors here!

Without factoring in tax benefits and principal pay down, you're $1800 ahead of the game by house hacking.

The Pacific Northwest is competitive, so leveraging those connections can be a game-changer.Second, when analyzing deals, ensure you’re building a framework to assess not just the property’s performance today but its future potential.

The closest comparison would be bourbon street for college age kids, but bourbon street may need to up its game.  

@Stuart Bartle welcome to the RE investing game.  

I've seen some well-known syndicators brag about having "skin in the game" when the truth is they invest $100,000 in $25 million deal but take home $250,000 or more in fees.

I wouldn't recommend trying to do something like this right off the bat, I think you need to get into the game and really know what you are doing before taking on that level of risk.Happy to chat more over a phone call or direct message if you want more insights or have more specific questions!