Those are notorious for leaking.

What happened was the tenants wound up inviting ex-cons as they got out of prison (San Quintin) into the units to live with them.I wound up evicting everyone and starting from scratch.

Zillow and the like are notorious for inaccurate info.

I am notorious (ask my wife) for missing or overlooking that one thing that blows the contingency out of the water.

You do have a right to reinstate or redeem a defaulted loan, however the lender could easily call the loan on a new breech, like the notorious due-on-sale clause, and begin a new foreclosure.Had it happen to me once so I just paid off the bank loan, but not after warning them: "...but you'll never do business in this town again!"

Yes little Danny, Santa will be coming soon.So, I'd say integrity very much follows degrees of expectations and expectations vary as well.A gang member in prison may have a high degree of integrity with respect to him in keeping with the expectations of his gang.

If they break the rules it's punishable up to 5 years in prison and $250,000 fine.Not only will HUD punish the buyer by the agent too by taking away their NAID number.

It seems to me that the 50 hours of free content should suffice, and after reading other posts, PW is notorious for adding fees and packages.

Vegas is notoriously bad for transient tenants which do a huge number on your vacancies and turnovers, both of which can cost a fortune.

One of the mortgage holders claims that while in prison the owner made 1 payment which revived the mortgage and extended the statute of limitations.8.