I'd suggest digging into the exact dollar amounts on a monthly and annual basis rather that measuring by rate percentages.

However, these walk throughs are fool-proof, it's just a measure to check in on the property.

Artificial limits that aren't based in reality have the negative unintended consequences that end up doing the opposite of what the "advocates" and politicians claim will happen.Third, and this has been the crux of the whole issue for me, let's just look at real examples of what has happened when "rent control" (which can take many forms not just the threat of using tax breaks) measures have been implemented. 

When homes are pulled in a safety inspection must be paid for prior to the home being occupied.

Tenant B replied that he was tired of “this” and that he wanted his lease terminated because he feared for his safety.

There are a couple spots around town I would avoid, but I chose to raise my kids here and have never been concerned for their safety. 

Such a short timeline doesn't give you any real margin of safety since you get out of debt, then right back into debt shortly thereafter.This depends on your current interest rate though.

While proximity to developing scenes and amenities suggests upward potential, the nearby "war-zone" area could raise significant concerns regarding safety, tenant quality, and property value stability.

School district ratings are not all encompassing...they don't measure some things that are important. 

As the property is a SFH (Single Family Home) it is exempt from the most restrictive rent control measures in place.