Naturally, that has led me into looking at some different markets.

The best benefit of syndications is the passive nature and the amount of information you can gather.

Your Natural Hazards Disclosure should have some of this but it is tricky.I think if the equity is there and you can move the money to a better producing asset, I think I would sell.

If that's the case, it may be simpler to just talk with the syndication sponsors to see if they'd make an exception for you.In general, mixing money across your natural financial boundaries has some risk, so creating partnerships like the one you describe should not be done without due consideration.

The strategy you described makes perfect sense, especially given the relationship-driven nature of the commercial industry.I appreciate you taking the time to go into detail about why this approach works so well.

Might want to also confirm community property nature of the underlying asset.

I'd say based on the information you provided, in addition to Steve clarifying the caveat emptor nature of Colorado,  you would have zero luck in pursuing from my experience.

Quote from @Kaylin Gonzalez: would appreciate any information  Depends on the nature of it.

This pandemic was predicted and modeled mathematically for decades to occur either naturally from deforestation and human contact with rare animal species and insect species, or in the situation of COVID 19 from direct human manipulation, of viral genetics.

Most likely the state where the property is located is where lawsuits would be brought if they are something for personal injury like a trip and fall or something of that nature because the “cause of action” arose in that state.