I would never allow that in any of my 120+ rentals.Tenants pay rent to inhabit a home, NOT destroy it.

- any other major red flags that I see with the tenants and the property inhabitants in generalAll of those should be pretty easy to see even if you do not have much experience and your agent may even be able to fill in the gaps for you.

I'm an AF civilian here at MAFB (Montgomery, AL).

You probably noticed that the government created quite a strong picture among all inhabitants that everybody should be almost 'in their right' of not paying rent when they had a difficult situation.

Would you allow this person to inhabit your rental?

Brother is in a doctorate program for physical therapy, Uncle is part owner of an architecture/CaD business, Cousin has high paying career at Tyson Food, my wife and I earn quite a bit between our civilian careers and air national guard pay, and my friend/co-worker/current business partner has a great salary being in the military.

We don’t see this as a significant risk and there will still be a sufficient number of potential civilian tenants even if the troops leave.After approximately €20,000 in renovations, ARV is estimated to be €410,000 to €440,000.We’re committed to the deal, but would love to hear people’s thoughts on the deal.

Brother is in a doctorate program for physical therapy, Uncle is part owner of an architecture/CaD business, Cousin has high paying career at Tyson Food, my wife and I earn quite a bit between our civilian careers and air national guard pay, and my friend/co-worker/current business partner has a great salary being in the military.

Any code violations that would condemn the house must be fixed before the house can be inhabited.

Any reasonable allocation method.For example, allocating the mortgage interest based on square footage might make a lot of sense.Allocating the water bill based on inhabitants per unit might make a lot of sense too.