data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8e144/8e1449435314684449c7ae7c0bebc69b84ddbd6f" alt=""
23 January 2025 | 26 replies
Hey Allen, When you approach the finance people, are you being specific in your request?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77223/77223de9af2fbf8e7959341e57c90c72c14b635a" alt=""
7 January 2025 | 4 replies
Can try to reposition to Class B, but neighborhood may impede these efforts.Vacancy Est: Historically 10%, but 15-20% should be used to also cover tenant nonpayment, eviction costs & damages.Tenant Pool: majority will have FICO scores of 560-620 (approaching 22% probability of default), many blemishes, but should have no evictions in last 2 years.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/15374/1537485a725a876549cfaa887668c4246d3ee768" alt=""
10 January 2025 | 6 replies
also how would I approach working with an investor?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c0e19/c0e1983f88c21d8f00c54cd06b52c45c1e7402cb" alt=""
9 January 2025 | 4 replies
Here’s how you could approach this:Set Clear Criteria: Use objective criteria (e.g., income, credit score, rental history) to evaluate applications in the order they are received.Notify Applicants: Let each applicant know you will process applications sequentially and explain your timeline for review.Act Promptly: If the first applicant meets your criteria, move forward with their application and provide them with a clear deadline to sign the lease and pay the deposit.Move to the Next: Only if the first applicant does not meet the criteria or declines the lease should you proceed to the next application.By focusing on one application at a time, you simplify the process, maintain transparency, and mitigate any potential fair housing concerns.Lastly, since housing laws can vary by location, double-check Arizona’s landlord-tenant regulations to ensure compliance with any local rules about how applications are handled.Best of luck with your rental process!
9 January 2025 | 4 replies
One common approach is to form a legal entity, such as an LLC, where both of you are equal partners.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c2349/c23495629891b11c24c395328d57e862813f8f3d" alt=""
1 February 2025 | 56 replies
Do you see any cases where a non-professional could safely participate in one of these with the right approach?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5b85e/5b85e947553add2069533f302be511ea748918b4" alt=""
7 January 2025 | 3 replies
A friend of mine in Austin once negotiated a partial buy back option when the seller realized they might want back in if the market soared.. from what I read in Bloomberg, that approach can work well if both sides trust each other.If the tenants’ rent covers your carrying costs, that’s a nice cushion, but you still need to clarify that buy back clause.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/693f4/693f4312e867a3574b160a97c2ea757586de6002" alt=""
23 February 2025 | 107 replies
I, being new myself, was considering a GURU approach.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/58402/5840257b0ea3b2c8e9f4a4764d31020cc9a175bb" alt=""
15 January 2025 | 24 replies
And with price and rent appreciation in CA, we feel confident in the long term approach with these properties.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/070e2/070e245ad9a93df272ce13d335d7b92de50f2970" alt=""
7 January 2025 | 20 replies
Additionally, it feels the most appropriate approach for both profiles I described above and allows me to focus on learning one strategy.