My terms are 1st,2nd and security which they understood although I did not screen them yet or have signed 1 yr lease.

Hi @Lucas Carl,Understood.

Neither one of you understood or answered my question.

It is being fully understood that except as specifically set forth herein, Grantor has made no warranties, express or implied pertaining to said property, the condition thereof including but not limited to, matters relating to environmental conditions or hazards on the property"Then later on its says " We are the sole owners of the premises and have good right and title to convey the same in manner aforesaid, and that they are free from every encumbrance, except as aforesaid and WE hereby Warrant and Defend the same against all lawful claims....."

I knew what cashflow I needed to make the deal work, and understood the ins and outs of the house. 

I purchased a 2 family 3 years ago, the one side the tenant had been there for 30 years, i was not going to displace them from their home, which they were worried about. they were paying $800 / m which is below what i could get for the property, but they loved living there, they take care of the property and look after it. after talking with them I did raise their rent right away to $1000 and they understood, but have not raised it since then. there is some value in having some tenants there that love to live there and look after the place, even though i have a PM that manages the property, it is worth that peace of mind to me, especially since the property is 3 hrs away from me.

The key thing here is to remain in contact with the current tenant, listen and help them feel understood, it's business and they'll understand that, but you'll have a lot better of a chance of them leaving the property in decent condition if you keep them informed and personally talk with them.

You own the building, nobody can tell you what units you can rent Understood.

Could anybody please explain to my these 1013 rules below with examples in numbers keeping in mind that my numbers are:purchased for 250 all cash dealsold for 600 - 30k for real estate agent = 570KTypes of Replacement Properties to Identify: Three properties without regard to their fair market value.Any number of properties as long as their aggregate fair market value at the end of the identification period does not exceed 200% of the aggregate fair market value of the relinquished property as of the transfer date.If the three-property rule and the 200% rule is exceeded, the exchange will not fail if the taxpayer purchases 95% of the aggregate fair market value of all identified properties.I do not understand exactly what "aggregate fair market value" means and especially the third point is a mystery... if you made it so far ;) and understood I misinterpreted the BOOT, could you please explain it to me with a clear explain in numbers?

I understood that stuct/MEP/civil design work will be RFPed after the architect's bids.