data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/096b9/096b9d92ed49216358d5388071a4987fc85591f1" alt=""
21 February 2006 | 2 replies
But usually again the interest rates are not as good as the 80/20 blends.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47e92/47e92350854bf989df3c39b0f4b9b05d5614a77f" alt=""
17 August 2006 | 8 replies
I recommend that you take an assessment of your likes and dis-likes then blend them into real estate.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da05d/da05de45c0196c8f2c1691eb2d954e3a9888c1b0" alt=""
31 August 2006 | 7 replies
It has many features and I would much prefer to give that out.. you can also make it seamlessly transfer to you cell phone..
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/df9ac/df9accc18e1fa7697e28378343e0dc5989997171" alt=""
31 January 2007 | 6 replies
The key is to give them the correct blend of hype and fact.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6b71b/6b71b581fa8a70877b4c19113fda1d67fa7813e0" alt=""
11 December 2006 | 9 replies
Here is what I am doing now.I poll from three locations electronically and take the blended #I use my local realtor to pull comps within 300 Sq Feet of the property I am looking atI look at the assessed value.Then I take those three numbers and blend them for an average.If the number is still under 70%, I will look into it further.Does anyone have a better formula?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30e22/30e222e4268ae0e71597103f669851e269cf6eca" alt=""
25 March 2007 | 12 replies
.- You will most likely have to pay MI (or a higher payment if the lender pays it for you)- Your blended rate will be higher then your previous interest rate (if you have to go with a combo loan).Regards,Scott Miller
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87268/8726844babe6e1e88e7bc38e203a71822f90bfd1" alt=""
18 March 2007 | 5 replies
These appraisals use a blended approach to value, using primarily the cost approach (reproduction cost to rebuild) and a small portion is the sales approach (recent sales).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b421c/b421c061746ac742882af55d6ec4e3ad6ceeb23b" alt=""
6 January 2014 | 52 replies
It is not unreasonable that you will still out run interest rate risk since your blended rate on both loans is greater than 6% and less than 12%.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0ba6/a0ba6abb336a1a046ccaf7c1b82ef73789cf0017" alt=""
17 January 2014 | 4 replies
The problem is the amort. schedule and rates to pay off the second are higher and the total rate blends up for the two loans versus neutral or down with a seller held second.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4176d/4176dd2451d8e644b12b04ecde9d0e5f63cb711a" alt=""
20 June 2020 | 16 replies
That way all windows are wrapped with aluminum and transition seamlessly to siding.