Yes i have read it and anyone who has read it and understood it could not possibly interpret this as an NAR win, there are still outstanding lawsuits by the way, The NAR will lose a lot of members, a lot of income, and most importantly, a lot of political power as a result of all this, the financial payout is nothing compared to all this.

In tax law there are kind of tiers of what determine something....There are interpretations and rulings that lead to how things are actually applied. 

My day job is that of a nurse at the local hospital, I asked around to find translation services through the hospital and paid an interpreter the $50 per hour to help us through this process.

Surely there be some attorneys or title issuers with this interpretation?  

Most people interpret that to mean buying your first property.

The IRS interprets that as taking profit out and you will be taxed on that.  

This could be interpreted as a Net Listing.

The lender's licensing and their attorney's interpretation of the Ohio statutes is what will determine if the lender will provide PPP options or not. 

Thank you for your response.I believe that here in Canada we are not allow to evict people that easy.But definitely is a subject I need to learn more about.Leandro:It depends upon which province you are in ... tenancy law (and its interpretation) varies by jurisdiction.  

@Upen Patelhttp://www.consumerfinance.gov/eregulations/1026-3...See/open "official interpretation" near top of page, just above "b. credit over applicable..."