I think that's going to be a tough sell to the IRS at audit.As for documentation - I've not yet represented anyone at audit where the IRS questioned the date placed in service.

So, you really need to do your due diligence in finding a mortgage broker/RMLO.Get references, then see if those references have any relationship with the LO,Look to their last state audit and compliance exam, if they never had a compliance exam, move on.Do they have the net worth to buy, at par, any loan they do that is non-compliant?

I was always impartial to having them.

Then, when you get audited you find out that the problem is an underlying matter that you failed to disclose (not knowing) when you got assistance and the IRS has no liability in giving you that assistance.

@Ian Ippolito what’s even more concerning to me is that the fed would have probably cut more than a half point but with it being so close to the election wanted to preserve its impartiality.  

Not having your Operating Agreement done correctly could be disastrous if ever sued or audited.

They are $300 a year (at least in my state) and he also noted that you are more likely to be audited.

May I ask the info for next Auditing such as time and location?

So, I just really don't see any reason to fear the IRS in this case, unless you are afraid of an audit. 

Stick that information in your tax records so that if you are ever audited (or asked) why you did what you did, you have information in your file to defend your numbers.