Quote from @Miguel Del Mazo: Thank you for the discussion @Corby Goade .I feel like we are biting off big pieces of a complex topic, and I think it would be helpful to focus on either the interests of the property owner or the MTR operator to simplify things,I think your greater objection to MTR arbitrage lies with why a property owner would want to willlingly enter into the agreement, so I will focus my reply on that. 

The objective is to upsell to a master mind program or the artificial intelligence datasets, which also have zero response rate.

This year will be the most I have paid for my taxes to be prepared, and the only year where I will be filing with an extension (and added stress).To be fair and objective with my feedback, the upfront consultation process went well.

I think knowing more numbers, heloc limit, plans and objectives for future goals all should play into "what is best".

If investors, you need experience and a strong understanding of how deals should be structured so that you can offer your investors adequate returns to meet their objectives while also having enough meat on the bone to be worth your efforts.

The objective is to upsell to a master mind program or the artificial intelligence datasets, which also have zero response rate.

I think a good thing about this company is how they value each home using automated software which is very very very objective in my view.

This mindset limits the size of investments I can pursue more than if I did not have this objective.   

I passed this additional charge onto our borrowers without any objections, making the total doc fee $1000.There are other companies that provide automated loan docs.

Financial objective- 100% to 400% cash on cash or don’t do it.