unless it was in microscopic letters I didn't see this box, anyone else not getting the grant?

Since family is involved in renting from you, it puts an extra microscope on this for the IRS.

The collateral interest assigned is different from an equity funded note than a note funded by cash.Any borrower/buyer who devises agreements to substitute collateral in an installment sale and convinces a seller to accept such an agreement is really crossing several lines, they can be terminating the contract, they can be inflicting undisclosed tax liabilities on the seller and they can be a party to fraudulently convincing the seller to releasing collateral as well as taking an improper security interest i a financing agreement.A substitution of collateral can be agreed to by a lender funding a loan with cash, they can release any collateral and accept other collateral interests.When a substitution of collateral is made in connection with a cash funded transaction between private parties, (an investor's LLC is not a lender and is a private party) that will be viewed under a microscope to ensure that sufficient value of collateral is the same or better and that such value is not based on the borrower's opinion.

Maybe my microscopic contribution is that one needs to believe that the mentor is a good and honest fellow and _can_ teach and this later measure is both factual and also a personality match up issue.I've not clarified anything I realize, just added that there's other dimensions customers to the mentor question.

Offering "foreclosure help" or foreclosure rescue puts you under a microscope as offering counseling type services, and opens you up to fraud accusations.

Hopefully such regulation would wipe out 80/90% of the "program gurus" and would put authors of "information" under a microscope as to the quality of information, experience and expertise of qualified counselors.

It took me a few years to get here with my wife from Viet Nam and they looked up our buttox with a microscope to make sure there was no wedding fraud.  

If you're concerned about operating legally, my first thought is not to temp the watch dogs in the first place, having a deal blow up with a buyer is likely, if he shows up in court, (and no, he doesn't need an attorney like a guru claims) your deal will go under a microscope, why even go there if you're not forced into that position?

Dust will soak into your eyeballs, the microscopic stuff.

You will have to manage the construction budget with a microscope but there is a larger upside potential.