In fact, Arkansas is the only state with no implied warranty of habitability.

I will simply leave that alone.To imply that the solution to a fraudulent loan application which would include a likeliness of a fraudulent purchase and sale transaction is simply some surrender of the property seems to stand on the other side of reality and ignores all other implications of what you are suggesting in the first place.

The law carries heavy fines and constitutes felony charges that can include jail time.David's comments imply you take an approach to "help", that would be a big mistake.

But there can be no doubt that you have stated things three different ways now. interesting.I did attempt to go back to pull out your quote, but the Topic summary only goes back so far while doing this post so I will have to find it later for you.And I find it interesting that you accept an apology that was never given or implied.

So, to those who post that something can or can't be done, unless you are throughly knowledgable with the subject matter, please ask it as a question or make it obvious that it is an opinion, otherwise it is taken as implied, as being factual.

This could be construed as an implied agency with the seller (creating a dual agency), which may or may not be legal in the state you're in and opens up the agent to additional liability (for no gain).

Finding great deals is a lot harder than those pushing wholesaling would imply.

The title Amendment, which last I looked contained a reference to the original Offer, implies a modification, not a new offer or counter offer. 

Although few promoting them actually say this directly, most imply there is  some liability protection from a land trust.

Making statements like "I would have thought there would be little to no appreciation in this area too." implies that the whole area is appreciating, and implicitly at 50%.