They can't really tell you anything you can't learn for free - and none of it is really rocket science.

Their data science crew determined it was a glitch on their end and apologized. 

I think Vallejo's future outlook will largely be driven by the outcome of the contrasting waterfront development and Orcem concrete plant proposalshttp://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2016/09/28/vallej...https://ww2.kqed.org/science/2016/11/21/vallejo-ce...

My point is that I come from a seat of authority and experience in all things numbers, science, engineering, data, analysis and acquisition, and I can tell you that what I am trying to show you is actually accurate.Let me be helpful.So please consider this my dude.You are talking mostly about response rate or leads.

The vast majority of folks here wouldn't have a clue what you're talking about anyway TA is not an exact science.

(I grew up in North Alabama, and we had a science field trip there in middle school once).  

Building science is one of the ways to push against it!

While I love ambiguity in my art and I recognize some of REI is an art-form rather than a science, I am also always looking for ways to increase accuracy in my analyses. 

These are all value-add things that justify the price increase from our purchase of the REO to our sale of the REO, even if the purchase and sale are the same day.It's not rocket science, and just because you don't believe it can't be done, doesn't mean it's not being done...some people here are proof of that...

Elanco (animal science headquarters), Eleven Park, Bottleworks District is some of the development that's occurring.