Hi William,Personally I wouldn't be willing to buy a C+ property for $55,000.Maybe if it was a solid B class.Then again, everyone has a different perception on the asset classes.I am based in Ohio and $50,000 sure does go a long way.

I got on the CL flag help forum and asked them about it and they said that since there is no category for RTO that means its not allowed on CL.... plus the general perception of RTO is that its a scam.... so people flag without even reading..I did an RTO last year and advertised with CL got tons of calls...and now she is getting financed for the house.

My perception of risk can be different from the next person.

Hall space is wasted and costs as much to build, but a buyer's perception is a smaller house because they look at the useable space.

I'm a little skidish about it since my perception is that a lot of areas are "d" areas…maybe more problems for an owner than worth a "good" deal.

Dont trust you perception of those little paper card samples.

Residential vacancy ~2% in my area in Richmond.But my question is less about potential for appreciation, and more about how the headline index numbers impact consumer sentiment, consumer spending, and perhaps skewing people's perception about the movement in real estate prices..

My perception is there is not a lot of demand for homeowner properties below that.

However; it depends on your perception, because even in a highly populated area, there are still smaller niches where you can be the big fish.I'm with @J.

Of course the perception comes down to the delivery of the message.