My concern is interpretation.

Sometimes folks try to interpret the rules them selves and try to find a way through the rules that lets them do something the city and the planners don't what.

What matters is the exact contract language -- which nobody commenting has seen -- and how VA courts would interpret that language under the circumstances.For anyone interested in getting deeper into the weeds on this: https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/sites/circuit/files/as...

Sometimes you can have legal advisers with opposite views and interpretation.

The following list of examples are intended as a guide to reasonable interpretation as to the differences between expected ‘wear and tear’ from normal residential use and irresponsible, intentional, or unintentional actions that cause damage to a property.

I don't know if I'm interpreting the coc roi correctly. 

The balance between having a very formal agreement to a loose one that can be left to interpretation.

I agree with your interpretation.  

It's also one of the most litigated and confusing issues when it comes to realty transfer tax since there's some level of politics involved (i.e. the interpretation of the PA Department of Revenue under a Democratic Party regime will not always match the interpretation under a Republican Party regime).  

Either their app doesn't accurately reflect the market, or their founder doesn't know how to interpret the results (both of which are huge red flags to me), watch this (1 min Shorts video) and I think you'll agree: www.youtube.com/shorts/F6Ci1sEvLh4