data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d768a/d768af18762d6a733262222c48bd7c76c9b119d2" alt=""
9 January 2024 | 5 replies
This next point is a grey area, subject to interpretation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/95a84/95a84382c3d45c2d4967dc34d60a8641ec7ef0b1" alt=""
10 January 2024 | 18 replies
I interpret this as a threat and intimidation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2a38e/2a38e88f637a31e13c8748864673019ca2e5cd1f" alt=""
9 January 2024 | 5 replies
Hi Folks - wanted to play out a scenario and see if how Im interpreting this is accurate...- 1031 a rental property and follow rules for new investment (like kind, equal/greater value, price point, etc) - Rent for X time (to prove intent) - Move into same property and declare as primary residence at +24month mark to fulfill requirement Two questions :- At the time of declaration, do you then pay Cap gains tax on original sale or are they still kicked down the road?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79211/7921118cfe6792e9bc5e3ca9fa214741758599e7" alt=""
16 July 2023 | 16 replies
Even a DST can utilize the 506(b) exemption.So if my interpretation of your question is correct, it's hard to say that one is "better" than the other because they each have a use case.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a00d/9a00dff6bab7fe55c8ed173beba4bceab4a3b2f4" alt=""
5 December 2018 | 59 replies
I may have interpreted this wrong, but I believe it was Grant Cardon that said to go to the decision maker for the negotiating, then put in the offer through the realtor.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c8007/c8007bff7b0819541090788fd510bf3f505dbd20" alt=""
18 February 2020 | 2 replies
I agree with Wesley's interpretation (I'm not a lawyer, but I've googled around for answers and recently read NY Code section 7-101).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a494d/a494d63d5b3daa91ff8b691df50522a0c9109c5f" alt=""
28 December 2023 | 82 replies
How we interpret it is clearly different, it's literally propped up by leverage and the liquidity behind it is gone.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98c96/98c96472d41ef210535789723f9c2e60d40d3dff" alt=""
27 September 2020 | 8 replies
To make your own determination, the Oregon state page with links to both of the ORS statutes is here: https://www.oregon.gov/CCB/licensing/Pages/whoneed...My interpretation is that if you buy a house and make improvements with the intent to sell, then you need a Residential Developer's License, even if you are hiring a GC.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99c58/99c58d2c61965e9d7f5cdb3267aff7069e01a886" alt=""
15 January 2024 | 9 replies
I see the numbers and I don't know how to interpret them.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd505/cd50563f0fac16e0b5864ca9235eb608c62ae0b2" alt=""
18 October 2014 | 7 replies
Basically, many of us are waiting on someone else to get sued or put into jail from these new laws so we know how they are being interpreted.