You really need to consult with a CPA who is familiar with International Business and possibly an attorney.Given the situation you outlined, in theory, it would make the most sense to have an entity in a low/no tax jurisdiction (think trade free zones).Profits can be held in that entity and personal distributions can be made gradually.You may also want to get the advice of an asset protection attorney.Keep in mind the laws might change with the new administration but these are global business tactics used by large companies to reduce billions in corporate tax.

Bureau of Economic Analysis, the creative economy accounts for 4.2% of the GDP and is valued at $704 billion.

No one walks away from billions of dollars of infrastructure so the vast majority of these projects will be completed.

And what about the 90 billion in pre-recession commercial loans that is coming due.....https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-01-24/a-90-billion-wave-of-debt-shows-cracks-in-u-s-real-estate-boom

I'd rather take a nap than fly around in my jet doing seminars or overseeing my billion dollar portfolio or whatever.  

It's been said on here a billion times but you make your money when you buy the house.

If it's a small institution (Say under $4 billion in assets) you might be able to make some sense to a decision maker.

http://www.sfexaminer.com/politics/49982712.html Thank god they figured out they were wrong after throwing 800 billion dollars at it; at least now they are closer for throwing the next 800 billion dollars.

i don't have the article to substantiate my claim, but since the 2004 athens games, 41 billions has already been spent for the olympics games.

Make sure the $25 billion that goes right back to Uncle Sam gets used for debt reduction.