But I will be incorporating the water into some of the landscaping and from a moral standpoint don't want to allow unnecessary pollution on my property. 

The sale is made pursuant to Chapter 5, Title 54 of the Revised Statutes of the State of New Jersey, as amended, industrial Properties may be subject to the Spill Compensation and Control Act (N.J.S.A. 58:12-23.11 et seq), the Water Pollution Control Act (N.J.S.A. 58:10A-1 et seq) and the Industrial Site Recover Act (N.J.S.A. 13:1K-6 et seq).

Total pollution exclusion - many policies have this exclusion and it can become an issue if there are injures due to Carbon Monoxide.Premises liability coverage is important even though liability claims are more rare than property damage.

Of course traffic, pollution and high cost of living are all challenges that are not going away.Taxes are a problem that is driving out some businesses, but really it is a burden on the wealthy people of the state more than it is corporations.

And sometimes pollutant loads in a house increase just because the air filter needs to be changed and someone left it in place for months. 

People will get deterred from buying a house there, which in turn lowers the market value of that area.3) Visual pollution. 

I know this depends on factors such as area, noise pollution, proximity, etc...Does anyone have insight on this topic?

Seems to me, with internet connectivity, we could reduce traffic, pollution, and save energy resources by just allowing people to work from home - those jobs that really have no need for a physical presence inside the office building.

Sure, more renters is more taxes, but more renters is more people and more people is more traffic and more traffic means more roads, traffic lights, pollution, etc. - which means more expenses for the city.

They had concerns about liability, possible spreading to vegetation, trees or adjoining properties and air pollution from general burning and burning of toxic substances such as lead, asbestos, etc.