So there's a strong rental potential both from the tourist market and the internal market.There are places (like Sardegna) that reveal themselves as “precious†investment regions, for their rental potential and because properties values will be hardly affected by market changes."

I'm certain the process of discovery (interrogatories) will reveal names of the beneficiaries of the trust, the true owners.

Three other spots revealed themselves and the paper completely pulled away.

He said he's a cash buyer, but his concern is when he rehabs and resells the property that FHA funding for his buyer would be difficult because it will be revealed that the deed was transferred to me then to him during the double close.

I've had two occasions where the reference they listed told me not to rent to them because they were violent, late payers, or too needy.Not doing a criminal, credit, background check, which might have revealed criminal or credit problemsBeing slow to evict (mentioned by others)Believing their sob storiesAccepting partial paymentsFailing to document every conversation or interactionNot walking through the property to make sure they're taking care of it (I now walk through every 9 months so I can see problems in different seasons)We've found crack pipes and other paraphernalia after they moved outWe've discovered piles and piles of trash (some bagged, some not) in closets, basements, sheds when trash cans and pickup service are included in their rent - all they had to do was carry it out, at no cost to themWe've Found smokers, pets, extra peopleOverall, I've had great success as a property investor. 

Demo revealed an active infestation and damage requiring about $15,000 in additional costs.

There are facts which I did not reveal in my original post because the counter claim has not been filed.

Of course you have no obligation to reveal anything but if you keep talking about these miraculous infinite re-fi deals which not a single other poster on BP seems to manage, its up to you to convince us.

Further, by answering the direct question honestly he may be saving his client from future liability resulting from his clients instructions to lie to the direct question.The point is that not revealing something considered immaterial (by law) and not answering a direct question honestly are two very different things and should not be confused with each other.

The family can easily claim they were embarrassed to reveal a disability so they tried to negotiate a pet even though they knew they did not have to pay more or give in to your illegal demands.