Eventually it was resolved, but I am very cautious and run title searches before paying the balance.I am dealing with a purchase now where the underwriter will not issue a tittle policy because on a previous transfer of the property the notary, witness and the seller had the same, very uncommon, last name.

This is consistent with what I have witnessed.  

From my experience and others that I have witnessed the best thing to do is buy a affordable single family house, stabilize it over a two year period.

This protects the company by giving them the ability to check with witnesses, gather info, etc. to defend the suit if it comes.

Did anyone else witness this exchange?

(Thanks, Business Law with UCC applications, 13th Edition ;)) I think this portion of the law is what you're most concerned with as I'm of the opinion that your contract offers consideration (a house for money), you're legally permitted to assume that the other party to the contract possesses the capacity required, and I'm just assuming that there is nothing illegal about the exchange.Assuming your offer was in writing (real property contracts require writing), and you appointed your agent in writing, and your agent made the offer on your behalf (or you made the offer directly in writing), AND your contract spelled out clear and reasonably definite terms, AND it was signed, witnessed, and delivered, I would say you've got pretty good grounds to pursue the contract. 

What the linkage is is that Mexico is becoming a wealthier country, as witnessed by the rise of its middle classes.

@Sara W. It

Keep the property (no, owner wants nothing to do w/ it),b.

Whether you were the direct perpetrator with intent or a passive witness to a crime, you’ll be liable and penalized for the crime if it happens under your watch.