Which is why I wouldn't suppress.  

Thus when you make future purchases, you have the option to "suppress" against past purchases so you don't get the duplicates.

call around, I called a few before finding my alarm and sprinkler guy ;p if they know the specific township, it's better ;pI had a fire suppression system put into my restaurant.  

I made a file in Evernote and called every single one in my county, and asked about their appetite for lending and kept that in my note, to save me time when I do this again in the future.

One thing to remember is if pulling both list is to suppress your sellers list against your buyers list so that you dont mail "I want to buy your House" mail to investors actively buying.

The jobs are fantastic and being located near the heart of these communities is even better, but the areas are still challenged and there is still little appetite or demand from locals to own in these areas either as investors or owner occupants.From 2007 to really 20011/2012 it was not so much that the rents dropped because of value, it was the challenge of being able to get a qualified resident into a property and keep them there.  

Suppress the second list against the first list so you don't buy duplicates. 

List 1 run for absentee and owner occupied separately30-100 equity30,000+ equity dollar2-3 bedroomslast sale date to the day of list pullCurrent value zero to medianSFR NO trusts or corpsList 2 run for absentee and owner occupied separately 30-100 equity30,000+ equity dollar2-3 bedroomsNo sale date filterCurrent value zero to medianSFR Include trusts or corpsDon't dedup this list but suppress against list 1

I'm referring to the wealth preservation buyer who can overpay b/c they're doing a 1031 exchange and do not need to satisfy LP appetites for a 15%+ IRR.

All one needs to do is buy the  list with 1-1-1900 to today as last sale date and suppress against that a list without the sale date as a filter.