I think this case is begging for a compromise because it's the right thing to do.  

Keep looking in your area, do not compromise, and find properties that do work.

I believe that cutting an opening on the side to make a door could compromise the structure of the house... as external walls are definitely load bearing.

Here's what I would do as a compromise: pay off all non-house debt, have 6 months cash set aside, take wife on a vacation; buy a local turnkey property.

Apparently, the house was hit by a car and compromised its integrity so it was demolished.I'm looking at simply flipping the land and was wondering what I should have done before listing it.

Each month they are continuously improving their system and adding new features while not compromising the functionality of the system, and not requiring a learning curve each time.

I've had friends who live (personal residences) on Palmer st. and I've thought before that a 2-3 bed dobie style or duplex home on Ried, Palmer, Albert could be a good compromise.

It could easily run you another 5-15k with permits, unexpected leveling and breakage.With all of that done, the lift may have compromised the structural integrity of the house.

I am inclined to agree that you should be charging for the property not for the total number of occupants.However, the Same time certainly a house with 5 people living in it is prone to more wear and damage, Floors, if nothing else. perhaps I should at least charge a deposit like a pet deposit call it a roomate deposit. for adding anyone else to the lease.Is this a fair compromise?

If you've signed a buyer's agency agreement then the agent is in a dual agent role which IMO compromises their ability to serve either client well.