On a macro level, it's important that people can dispute fraudulent payments, because fraud happens, so it's not an inherently bad thing that banks support a payer's ability to dispute a claim.

If you insist on electronic payments you should purchase insurance to cover fraudulent chargebacks.Be careful. 

We have law enforcement risking their lives every day to combat this issue.  

In many cases its wrong doing by the QI, but this area seems to be ripe with fraudulent administrators.  

@Jon Holdman You're right, insurance company wasn't fraudulent per say - and like everything else in life, one needs to do their own due diligence.  

The business world has always had it's share of shady dealers, but that doesn't mean that all businesses are fraudulent. 

Whether that’s another syndication, or some sort of an actual property purchase that you can get either insider knowledge on/or some sort of extra bang for your buck on I feel that’s the best way to make money right now to help combat these high interest rates.

I'll skip the detail here, but again, long story short... we are currently suing him to remove a fraudulent lien on the property which he claimed the $ value at nearly 3x what was actually owed since we fired him, and almost 2x what was contractually listed at. 

The major problem was to find these who kept the jobs.Rentals with good quality were still rented but these dumpy one were empty - when someone was qualified for a rental - they got to choose.Also, the problem caused last recession was in fraudulent mortgage securities, which is now heavily regulated.Next crisis will be due to different reason: student loans, pension not funded etc......but with RE market that under supply of houses, it won’t happen overnight. 

Tenant is investing in a rental property based on a fraudulent lease.