One of my tenants have security camera facing other unit.

If you purchase a tax lien certificate and the property is vacant, do you have any right to rent it or only to physically secure it?

I look at a 12 month commitment with a rent of $5850 + a $5850 security deposit.

This can cause difficulties and delays in securing financing from lenders that don’t understand the issues involved, as well as problems obtaining licenses and permits from governmental entities that are unused to dealing with the series LLC structure.

Securing a sponsor can be challenging, especially when they have concerns about your capabilities to manage the property and keep it profitable.So, let me share a suggestion that might make a potential sponsor more comfortable:Offer to have them oversee the asset and property management aspects, including the control over cash flow.

And California also capped security deposit, thus literally robbing landlords by AB 468 that's faking human right issue.If there is class lawsuit, I want to be the first to jump on.But my question is, why landlords are so docile to this evil law? 

Lease should make tenant secure renter insurance.

If you are purchasing an asset then you could cross collaterize both but if $ for non secured asset may be easier to look to sell the loan.

If it’s a chattel filing with the state, the foreclosure would not affect the secured party’s interest… they could still repossess the equipment.

This may be the best time to secure a property, live in it (and less than 20% as a primary), then move or reassess the plan in a year after your mortgage implication is up.