Less money down means more money that can go into your rehab/stock market (I'm assuming you will make more than 5-7%).2) Low payment focus: If you prioritize stability of lower payments and are risk adverse, putting more money down is something to seriously consider.

It was a defining moment of reckoning, a stark realization that I had sacrificed years of my life for a career that seemed to be slipping through my fingers.Yet, amidst the despair, a flicker of resilience ignited within me, fueled by the echoes of past triumphs over adversity.

By spreading investments across these sectors, investors can reduce the impact of adverse movements in any single market segment.Conclusion: The Path ForwardWhile interest rates will invariably ebb and flow, the foundational principles of real estate investment remain constant.

You need to learn how to use all the tools available to you (financing, insurance, management, etc.) and to understand how they fit together in your toolbox, as none will give you everything (e.g, insurance is required and it will cover you for many situations, but not always; asset protection (LLC) is litigation insurance and complements regular insurance, by minimizing the target and making it unappealing).If you are a new investor, probably you will not have a lot of assets and/or equity to worry about (but even that is relative and subjective to each person tolerance to risk) so I would not worry about that till you pass that risk threshold (in my opinion 100K+ in equity, maybe 50K if you are really risk adverse) and you should be primarily concerned with finding good deals and growing your business first.

You can "cure" a void tax sale with 3 years of adverse possession that starts on or after the date a tax deed could have been issued, In other words, you start with the date 3 years after the tax sale, and if some time after that the investor adversely possesses the land for 3 years, then the statute of limitations expires and the heirs cannot claim the tax sale was void.

Thanks Ken, found out someone in the neighborhood has designs on the property via an adverse possesion.

My concern is I tend to be less risk adverse especially with short term losses if the long term gain is worthwhile (i.e maybe the property might not cash flow today but it gains more equity).

Such use does not adversely affect property values in the subdivision,neighborhood, or area.4.

Nothing like trying to resolve a problem when the adverse parties don't like each other.

Remember that the IRS has strict rules regarding SDIRAs, and any violation of these rules could result in penalties and adverse tax consequences.