data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/49621/49621a7a79668a871223ac2813363f9513cd5f35" alt=""
27 May 2010 | 36 replies
A few interesting statistics included: 1.25-1.5 "new" jobs to justify additional housing units, the same number employed now as we had in 1990, anticipated +2% to mortgage rates over the next two years, and the possibility of $5 gas within the next couple of years.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/49621/49621a7a79668a871223ac2813363f9513cd5f35" alt=""
13 May 2010 | 41 replies
Worst 1-Year Home Price Change- from 1980 thru 2009" values were "-22% (first quarter of 2009)"= from first quarter 08 to first quarter 09 there was a 22% drop in prices.Keep in mind that rises/drops can be cyclically or seasonally related, so compare changes to historical statistics for that specific area.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/49621/49621a7a79668a871223ac2813363f9513cd5f35" alt=""
4 May 2010 | 30 replies
I don't know the statistics on black, white, asian etc.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99b2b/99b2b268d709d4ff449467a89315f3b8841f5157" alt=""
11 May 2010 | 21 replies
To them it is a statistic game.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/76abb/76abb283bbedf3428b32077421f790ed3b52bb68" alt=""
26 June 2010 | 67 replies
If you're up on your "Z" test in statistics, all the better.
7 July 2010 | 27 replies
Couple websites for solid market data:www.economy.com _Moody's website on economic data.www.realpoint.com / http://corporate.morningstar.com _national statistical data www.trepp.com -CMBS stats/ CRE deal tracking/ national mortgage datawww.realpage.com -formerly Yieldstar.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47077/470776920aab96f9caec3d9e594d235f8003acde" alt=""
27 June 2010 | 3 replies
We did send out 20 yellow letters last week and we got two responses...I thought that was pretty good (10% success) although the numbers are probably not statistically significant because of the small sample size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/afae9/afae96267d3b270703fca9b28c8b776014ea8e7a" alt=""
9 July 2010 | 8 replies
Maybe add some statistics on the co's performance, what clients are saying, etc.Best of Luck!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac26d/ac26d772ddf11ad943fc4712a32181fdeab43d01" alt=""
27 July 2010 | 14 replies
Don't get caught up in the statistics.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/71d5a/71d5ae9613141d5eddc405bef66d22d46449d593" alt=""
14 July 2021 | 96 replies
I am in investor myself and have long term relationships with other investors I work with.I am not looking for some huckster trying to get cheap service one time and then use someone else the next time.Many know bonuses tied into conditions are a waste and the sellers will look for any out to screw the buyers broker.This is why to just pay a higher buyers co-op is better.The TRUTH is you will get more showings with a higher commission that is guaranteed IF the property is priced correctly for it's condition and location.The statistics are about 86 percent of new agents won't last a year in the business.Knowing that they will likely only do a few deals before burning out they are looking at 2 things.1.The broker will have them on a fat split where the agent is on a 50/50 or 60/40 split their first few transactions.2.With only making a few sales they want them to count (big co-ops).Why do you think builders are always paying higher co-ops??