data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/866b3/866b35853ed4a710addd1b005df208852cba6455" alt=""
9 January 2025 | 9 replies
If you start a JV in name but do not give your partners proper control and decision-making rights and the deal goes bad you open yourself up to serious consequences which can lead to SEC violations with extremely high fines.Lastly, you can offer the project up to investors who have no voting or control.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f708c/f708c01f91e8c0333aeb423915eb9241b5496b93" alt=""
10 January 2025 | 12 replies
Haha, I'm only asking, because 1) I can't seem to find anything saying it's not allowed and 2) A previous thread of mine was deleted for apparent violation of some rules.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/051a4/051a4d6c3631382efdd10389c9e8d27c38a6cc4d" alt=""
11 January 2025 | 5 replies
That violates the Takings Clause.MD can be distinguished (in fact MD was mentioned in the decision) in that there IS a process on the books for the foreclosed owner to petition the court for the surplus.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d71e/1d71ef96da06fdd86369fc054b16f599348a99ce" alt=""
10 January 2025 | 8 replies
(Yes it still happens, but it is a lease violation, and we have a solid leg to stand on should we need to pursue eviction or collections later.)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d228f/d228f69a1e5be15ac732cb4b38d87aa67a6a7ca7" alt=""
15 January 2025 | 8 replies
NEVER violate this rule.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c2349/c23495629891b11c24c395328d57e862813f8f3d" alt=""
25 February 2025 | 95 replies
Which would beg the question of if the homeowners were in the mental capacity to legally enter into a transaction; if this transaction is somehow a violation of of consumer law or fraud, etc.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c0a6a/c0a6a74b1012c70ab694d042189f62544ec2a128" alt=""
23 February 2025 | 246 replies
A permit was was pulled in 2019 to close out violations as the remarks indicate the home was renovated without permits.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2bcdf/2bcdf773bd30f27a9a61008c2b8426e283b6d707" alt=""
15 January 2025 | 13 replies
I'm not opposed to spending the money and have a demo scheduled with them this week, but was curious if anybody else has other data providers that they like better for more niche areas of distress such as bankruptcy, probate, divorce, code violations etc. that I can stack with my current data.I have submitted right-to-know requests with the local counties but only certain information is available and can be cumbersome.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aa993/aa993b05f3726a36d89f439d4322be690feb730c" alt=""
12 January 2025 | 28 replies
All of the rooms should have locks on them (and they shouldn't unlock unless the correct code is entered) and if one of them picks a lock to go in a vacant room, that should be automatic lease violation and eviction.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f7c9/9f7c94f4984ab570daff4030d34d2990ee518683" alt=""
6 January 2025 | 12 replies
Property manager (PM) 's lawyer continued the case to get the unpaid rent from the tenant.PMA between landlord and property manager(PM) has also expired so landlord got the property back , but when landlord requested to settle the account and the deposit( there is one month deposit from landlord also), PM refuses since the lawsuit is going on with the tenant, Additionally PM is still charging the monthly property management fees from landlord even though landlord is managing the property.Landlord is done dealing with PM and requested the PM to withdraw the lawsuit against the tenant ( landlord is aware that he will loose 2 months rent), PM came back saying they cannot withdraw the lawsuit since that will violate fair housing law.QUESTION:Does withdrawing unpaid rent case against the tenant violate fair housing law ?