"In addition, the trial court noted several other aggravating factors, including xxxxxx‟s failure to successfully complete probation, his pattern of physical abuse toward women, his history of substance abuse, evidence of multiple instances of molestation toward the victim, and his violation of a position of trust."

You think a seller would want to find out the day before closing, after they've moved out, that you can't get financing and you get your EM back, no harm no foul?  

You may also discuss with your instructor, but the person that is most at risk by your failure to disclose properly (besides you) is your broker.In my opinion, there is not any harm in disclosing, their is potential harm in NOT disclosing.  

Your guy may have a substance abusers or gambling problem.Everyone has a part in this.

I'm certain that, at the very least, that I am going to fire the PM.The losing money/being lied to aspect is a big issue for me regarding this matter, but more than anything I don't want anyone else to get harmed by these people.

If you can't prove harm or have to move or coughed up a lung with xrays to prove it you're better off meeting the full residency requirement.

@Justin Conza Since the agent reached out to you there's no harm in trying to work something out.

I don't really care what they call it its the substance that makes a difference to me

It's up to you as an investor to decide which it is.Price run-ups, even rapid ones, are not automatic indicators of a 'bubble' per se, though this definition seems to be trending over the last few years, rather a bubble is significant price appreciation without the fundamental substance to support it.

That being said, there's no harm in keeping it listed for sale and putting it up for rent at the same time.