Sort of a "hooray for me and to hell with you" movement - even with multiple protests and several votes of residents to defeat the new train.Not that it's especially relevant, but the stories of corruption on the build and management of the contract are legendary.  

If you're committing to having a new tenant every six months, you're defeating the purpose of being a landlord and there are a limited number of tenants (usually corporate tenants) which would be interested in moving to a place for six months (or less).

Airing these simplistic, one sided diatribes among the mostly educated members of BP defeats the purpose of what appears to be a sales pitch for the ignorant and get rich quick crowd

Besides that would defeat the purpose because I would want to continue to live in the extra unit.  

The leverage would def eat into my cash flow but with the $500k of money I just generated I'd buy 7 more properties.

No utilities defeats the purpose of 80% of the inspection.

Paying down properties defeats that strategy.

However If I'm leaving money in the property doesn't this defeat the overall purpose of the model?  

That seems like it defeats the purpose and having to use multiple systems is what made me develop my own.

If I owned property in Marion County, I would do everything I could to defeat this proposed local law or ordinance!