I'd suggest targeting 2 families below $300k (decreasing supply of these), and 3 families in the ~350k range.

In the course of one year a house typically won't increase or decrease materially.

Small lending will get a chance, small business will find better rates, bonds will finally become worthwhile, stocks PE should decrease, and retirees will get a break.  

slightly off topic . in Hawaii, while on vacation we heard some loud yelling and and what sounded like a lot of domestic violence happening - I went outside and was trying to determine the location of it and soon another guy joined me who had also heard it - we discovered the room it was coming from and both approached to ask if everything was ok - a big muscle bound guy answered the door sweating and breathing heavy - he said everything was ok and that him and his girl were just having a disagreement -when asked if she was OK - he said yes - then the guy that was with me asked she could please come  outside and confirm to us that she was OK - I was a little taken back by his boldness , but was glad he asked - so she came to the door and confirmed she was OK and didn't need any assistance.

I would start with the three year rental history to determine if increases took place or decreases.

Credit can only be run 45 days apart not to get hurt by score decrease.

As population increases, the availability of land decreases thus increasing its demand and value.

Combine that last one with the millennials increased inclination to move (to find jobs among other factors) and you have another factor decreasing the likelihood millennials will buy houses at the same rate that previous generations have.  

Borrowers see the decrease in purchasing power.

I only read about the decrease in corporate unemployment tax and the new toll tax.