Do one task at a time in each app so you can compare apples to apples.Load a property with pictures and details.Market that property.See what your marketing looks like from the public's perspective.Submit a fake application to see how easy the process is.

A smaller market of potential buyers should you want to sellA market of only investors, usually looking for a deal, should you want to sellCompetition with corporate MFH ownersApples to apples, generally lower quality tenants in apartments than housesHigher opening costs to get "in the game"I think SFH is a good way to get your beak wet.

Can anyone give me feedback, good or bad, on this program? I am very familiar with short sales however just not using realtors as the program suggests.
Thank you.

Find contractors who have a commercial location, drive a vehicle with permanent signing on it....not just magnets.....real business card...not just vistaprint.

Search "eprei" and all of them will come up.If you don't have any Apple products, you can also search for his podcasts on a radio app like TuneIn.

Unfortunately there are a lot of bad apples giving Detroit a bad name.

We need to enhance our screening to include behavior criteria so that when get rid of the bad apples that we won't replace them with more bad apples.

What you need to do is build a funnel to attract people using some sort of lead magnet that would then allow you to invite someone to book a conversation with you.

Funny enough, south bay housing becoming getting expensive too (after the era is scooped by FB/Apple/Google folks).

I've seen posts here which explain CR as an apples to apples comparison for a market...if the driving forces (demand etc) are consistent, is the CR variability simply how the sellers are pricing the property?