data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8b86/f8b86267aa851a430433ffcf69a29ffa05a80623" alt=""
30 November 2022 | 38 replies
You are the perfect example to illustrate this case.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a51a/3a51acdb7518ec8f8b64d89190bd11717e80419c" alt=""
19 March 2019 | 11 replies
This was just good business as it illustrated integrity which only solidified future business.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/23704/23704a762a25d5421c9c59df9fcb648b7613d3a9" alt=""
13 September 2021 | 21 replies
You just illustrated the biggest reason why I don't do that anymore.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4565/d456557d263ae20d83cd4f4b2e3d0324a6c54348" alt=""
8 February 2023 | 0 replies
To illustrate the time value of money in relation to accelerated depreciation in real estate, let's consider a building that has a total cost of $1,000,000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/983f9/983f9aaf58819e03dbc95296d40af0caa5c9d3bc" alt=""
3 April 2017 | 18 replies
To illustrate why this is better for value add (aka forced appreciation), lets say you work to fix up your property and as result you increase rents and increase NOI by $10,000/yr.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9bb2e/9bb2e50f3b07cb74032d4420ac6886307a965364" alt=""
27 April 2023 | 12 replies
Since you are considered the end user of this project depending on how the verbiage is illustrated, all responsibilities should be the GC's, I would highly recommend researching and using the workflow of the PMP mythology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/94301/94301afc26fa986c3c272fc6f5c8e17aefb4484d" alt=""
2 December 2022 | 14 replies
Please know that I oversimplified the following example to illustrate the difference between cash flow and appreciation; my assumptions are not real world.My assumptions:Property A appreciates at 7% annually but has zero cash flow.Property B has a 7% cash/cash return but zero appreciation.The combined state and federal income tax rate is 30%.Purchase price: $400,000.Down: 25%Acquisition cost: $100,000 (25% X $400,000)No inflationNo rent increasesNo loan costsNo closing costsNo renovation costsNo vacanciesNo maintenance costNo management expensesNo principal paydownAs you can see, if you buy in a high-appreciation market, you will have far more investable cash than cash flow.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/034af/034af6b8a8483f2c26580714c7f1887a04ecc3b6" alt=""
31 March 2015 | 2 replies
So I took the map and opened it in Adobe Illustrator (I believe they have a free trial version for 30 days).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6c0d6/6c0d6bb16676b4addbf3920b538ac01138b2a856" alt=""
20 March 2023 | 36 replies
This is what these policies are illustrating and what is most likely.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/83e9e/83e9e23433e72c900715539a2b936df5c9b391c4" alt=""
22 February 2021 | 3 replies
Fresh out of another such conflict, I want to illustrate how it works.The easiest way to do so is with an example.20,000 miles driven during the year15,000 of those miles (75%) was for business$10,000 annual expenses for gas, insurance, maintenance etc.PART 1 - TAX DEDUCTIONIf you use the standard IRS mileage allowance of 58 cents/mile (2019), you have a $8,700 deduction, and your Schedule C looks like this:If you use the actual expenses method, you claim 75% of the $10,000 operating expenses, or $7,500 plus 75% of the depreciation.