The subconscious or maybe not so subconscious belief that Black people or all low income minorities devalue neighborhoods and destroy property is a very hasty generalization of the whole based on behaviors of the few.

The lady has shown extreme instability and has threatened to kill herself in my house to devalue the property.

But do we run the risk of devaluing the property if that space is vacant and buyers and agents use the GRM to valuate the place? 

But do we run the risk of devaluing the property if that space is vacant and buyers and agents use the GRM to valuate the place? 

But do we run the risk of devaluing the property if that space is vacant and buyers and agents use the GRM to valuate the place?

But do we run the risk of devaluing the property if that space is vacant and buyers and agents use the GRM to valuate the place?

They are to “blame”.That being said I think the fed devaluing savings and incentivizing money borrowing/investing/risk has ultimately lead housing to where we are today.

These types of properties are rather unique unto themselves, how to best lease, duration of tenancy, what ideal tenants value and de-value, how they act in regards to management etc etc.

Seems odd that they can devalue a property by asking so much. 

As far as risk vs reward, I can make the argument that it’s “riskier” to keep your money in a bank (FDIC insured) while it’s getting devalued at record levels each year.