Quote from @Demon S Rogers: @Alex Breshears @Shiloh Lundahl what are typically the requirements for these types of loans ? 

Quote from @Joe S.: Quote from @James Hamling: Quote from @Rick Bassett: Quote from @Nathan Gesner: Wrong.

Will the 100's of thousands to input into the project provide a viable return or a cash out/equity push up refi for it to make sense? 

Many times the number(s) provided are dissconnected.

All the #'s your using are SOOOOO skewed.

., before December 30If the earliest possible date investor was actively carrying on a trade or business was December 30, 2004, then any expenses incurred in that year but incurred “before the day on which the active trade or business” began, all the expenses incurred from January 1 through December 29, 2004--would be, by definition, start-up expenses whose deductibility, and possible amortization, is expressly dealt with by section 195 (Start up amortization).Court case for reference: Code Sec(s): 162; 195Docket: Dkt No. 30077-07.Date Issued: 04/30/2009Judge: Opinion by Gustafson, J.Tax Year(s): Year 2004.Disposition: Decision for Commissioner.

There's a very good chance the issue(s) you face have already been discussed and answered.Ask questions in the appropriate forum.

I've dealt with 1,000's of Section 8 tenants.

Quote from @Bill S.: @Clare Cui so I don't have an answer.

It seems so much better cash flow than properties listed in my area, where you're lucky to get a couple hundred bucks.Example of break-even in Tacoma, WA:https://www.redfin.com/WA/Tacoma/3734-S-M-St-98418/home/2978...What am I missing that these seemingly ridiculous cash flow properties are available in other areas in the country?