Use your own title company or attorney, and pay all closing costs and title insurance yourself.While a lot of people think #1 is the better option (less money out of pocket), I highly prefer #2, for several reasons:-  For me, it's actually cheaper, since my closing attorney charges so much less than bank's attorney, the savings outweighs the cost of the title insurance and other closing costs the bank will pay.-  The closing is MUCH faster, especially if your closing company pushes on the bank's closing company.  

The money that you save on a deal by purchasing it at the right price will outweigh the cost to maintain your license.  

The problem with analyzing large data sets is that it is difficult to account for these different variables.I think your question is "Will the cost savings in terms of holding costs outweigh the price reduction on the house I am selling, assuming this will allow me to sell faster". 

do the recorded rules outweigh the approval for the variance?

. - I could have taken them to court, but the fees did not outweigh the money spent, plus I got $50 increase in rent when they moved so I was not too disapointed.

The value of what can be gained there outweighs years of rents.

It definitely has its downsides, but from my experience, the pros have outweighed the cons tenfold. 

He understands that the long-term benefits of being in the market will outweighs any up or down swings along the way!

Not sure if the tax benefits or being close by would outweigh the out of state cash flow opportunity?

Does the good outweigh the evils?